It Chapter Two (2019)

IT Chapter 2 takes place 27 years after the events of the first movie. This doesn’t mean like I thought that it would just feature the losers as adults but there would be a mixture of the two. It’s a strange start to the film because within 10 minutes we have had a homophobic attack and a domestic violence attack.

There are problems with this film and its largely narrative. Its 35 minutes longer than chapter one and yet there is very little reason for it. Overall these films run to 5 hours and 4 minutes which is about two hours longer than the 1990 version. Ok the 1990 is meant to be terrible (minus Tim Curry) but we spend five hours doing what could have been done in three. We have to spend an age seeing the losers as adults and they all react differently. It felt at times like they were padding things out to hold off the final act for as long as possible. There are a couple of moments where someone wants to leave and gets talked out of it.

It really doesn’t get going until they arrive at the chinese restaurant. Then what happens from that moment are a series of moments which are done well but then there is a gag that undermines it a little bit. Its first noticeable in the restaurant and then happens a few times. I’m not sure whether they felt it needed a bit of humour but I found it distracting. Also there a moment where young Eddie is covered in black goo and play Angel in the Morning for no reason. There are also a couple of moments which caused laughter in the screening I was in and I cant say that I was surprised or bothered. It was hard to take them seriously at times.

There are good things and they are largely the cast. I thought that all the people in this are on top for and I believe they are the same character that they were in the first film. I’m not the biggest James McAvoy fan and yet actually found him to be quite good. Jessica Chastain was equally as good as the grown up the Beverly. However everyone is overshadowed by Bill Skarsgard as Pennywise. I thought that he was really good in the first one and is equally as good in this one. Some people have commented that when he is out in daylight then he loses his menace but I disagree. I thought that every time that he was on screen he was scary and chilling.

The jump scares were quite good. The one scare with the giant statue man with the axe did make pretty much everyone in the screening I was in jump (including myself). Normally they are quite forgettable two seconds after they appear, but on this occasion they are well done. Also the fact that they have managed to degage the younger cast was done quite well. For a while I thought they must have filmed it during the first one but then I thought they can make people look younger like they did in the Avengers film and most of the time the de-aging effect is well done. There are a few moments where its quite obvious but overall its done well.

I don’t think that Chapter 2 is as good as the first. But its not terrible and bearing in mind I was worried that this film was going to disappoint me, thankfully it didn’t and that was a relief.

Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019)

So this is the third film in the ‘monsterverse’ which follows on from 2014’s Godzilla (which I quite liked) and 2017’s Kong: Skull Island (which I also quite liked) and this film is directed by Michael Dougherty who directed 2015’s Krampus and this film has a lot to live up to and in my opinion it doesn’t quite live up to it.

There are some good things in this film. Bradley Whitford is in this film although I didn’t recognise him (still think of him from his West Wing days) and he does provide some comedy moments. Then there are some cool shots with the monsters but I cant remember the names of monsters and what they were doing but there were some good shots. Millie Bobby Brown is also quite good as Madison who despite having a mother who does things for stupid reasons and a father who would rather take pictures of wolfs eating than spending time with his daughter. Whilst she has to do her own share of stupid things, I thought she was one of the better characters in the film. Plus I like Stranger Things so she would have to be terrible for me to put her in the negative column.

The main problem with the film is where Godzilla and Kong: Skull Island there is a lot of build up and it feels like time is being spent building things up whereas this film does feel like its very generic in terms of blockbusters. Characters aren’t given time to develop and just say their bit and move on and it just doesn’t work for me. Charles Dance is wasted here. When I saw him I just wanted to him to be like he was in Game of Thrones yet here its like he’s not even trying. I don’t think its his fault entirely but the story needs a baddie and cant quite decide who the baddie is.

Godzilla: King of the Monsters is ultimately a missed opportunity with too many monsters and too many characters. It’s a shame really because as Marvel have shown, it is possible to have loads of characters providing you know what to do with them. This is more like Age of Ultron than Avengers Assemble.

Avengers: Endgame (2019)

I cant recall a film having higher expectations than this film. I saw the film two weeks after the film came out when I knew the buzz would have died down but when I went to see it, the Box office takings had crossed the $2billion line and James Cameron sent a half-hearted tweet congratulating Marvel for surpassing Titanic.

So basically the plot is that the remaining Avengers go back in time to get the stones and stop Thanos from collecting them. It’s a simple enough idea which is handled well and doesn’t feel like its dragging its feet to much although I personally thought that it was about 30 minutes too long. All the stuff with them back in time trying to get the stones went on a bit too long but apart from that the film worked very well. Bearing in mind that its 181 minutes (not including the trailers they stick on at the beginning), it didn’t feel like a 3 hour film. So much happens and you are never allowed to really stop and think about what is happening.

There are a few MECU films that I haven’t seen like Black Panther and the Ant-man films so I found Ant-man to be useful to the story but I just found him to be the least important of the characters.

I’m sorry but I still find Brie Larson rather smug. She is less smug in this but I just find her to think she’s above everyone even though this is only her second film in the MECU. I’m glad she’s not in it for very long but when she does come in towards the end its like she’s saying to everyone ‘You can rest now, I’m here to save the day’. It makes everyone look silly and asks why we should care about them if Captain Marvel can save the day in two seconds.

I liked how they came up with a line that allows them to go back in time but doesn’t screw with the films that came before it and doesn’t say to you that you wasted your time in watching them because they still happened. They use the line that just because you go back in time and change whats happened, doesn’t mean that it changes the future. What did slightly ruin the discussion for me is when they mention films and TV that deal with time travel that they didn’t mention Doctor Who. This film has a former Doctor Who companion in it FFS and yet it didn’t get mentioned. Oh well. Another thing I was very impressed with what how they managed to make Michael Douglas look about 40 years younger and Chris Evans look 40 years old. Both effects were very well done and show that this sort of thing will be happening more and more in films.

Despite having so much riding on it and having to achieve so much, the thing that most impresses me about this film is how it works. It wraps up 20+ films and still manages to start threads for new films. It says thankyou to those that came before whilst putting over the new stars. Credit has to go to the Russo Brothers for directing a film that does so much. The final scene where all the Avengers return and Thanos realises that he is in trouble is one of the best moments I have felt in a cinema since The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers when the wall at Helm’s Deep blows up. Seeing everyone charging is a great sight and does what its suppose to do in a film and that is deliver a moment that cinemagoers can cheer on and enjoy and boy does it achieve that.

I think that this is the point that I am bowing out of the Marvel films. I have enjoyed them but figure that now is the time to stop going to the cinema to watch them unless something stands out but as it looks like Brie Larson is going to be the spearhead from the next generation, I don’t think I will be watching.

Stan & Ollie (2018)

Laurel & Hardy are two of the finest double acts ever. This tells the story of their visit to the UK in the latter stages of their careers when the golden era is long gone. Steve Coogan plays Stan Laurel & John C. Reilly plays Oliver Hardy and I really like Coogan and have mixed feelings about Reilly although his recent outing in Kong: Skull Island shows he can still deliver a solid performance. The story moves to 1953 in Newcastle however where they shot this is in Dudley where I live so it was the rare instance where I was taken out of the location filming. That’s not a criticism that most people are going to have because they have never been there or will go there but it was one of two times I spotted areas of The Black Country Living Museum and it was fun to see.

Like Laurel & Hardy, Steve Coogan & John C. Reilly have very good chemistry together. Despite being a big fan of Alan Partridge and thinking that this is his best ever role, I enjoyed Coogan as Stan Laurel. He brings out the creativity of Stan and how he was in a way the brains of the team. John C. Reilly is under impressive prosthetics that makes Hardy warm and physically fragile. Both Coogan and Reilly look like Laurel & Hardy and along with their mannerisms you totally buy into the fact that these aren't impressions but performances that feel like they are paying homage to the real people. 

The attention to detail and nods to their greatest hits is quite good. The recreation of their dance in Way Out West is impressive and that's within the first few minutes of the film. Then there is a nod to The Music Box where they are moving a trunk up the train station steps and it falls to the bottom. There are plenty more there but I would be here forever but they are done in such a way that will please people who have seen the films and not be left out of funny moments. You are left to enjoy them and appreciate them which is the balance that the whole film took and got right.

As you would expect from a film that takes place during their final years, there is a hint of sadness. They aren't the Laurel & Hardy from their heyday and when they have their truthful discussion it was one of the more sad moments of a film that is generally filled with a lot of humour. Sadly the final part of the film has Hardy’s health deteriorating and even though they plough on and go to Ireland, there is always a hint of sadness with their performance.

I really enjoyed this film. Yes there is a lot of sadness but one thing that gets you through is the lovely heartfelt performances from Coogan and Reilly. The attention to detail is really impressive and the film looks stunning. I think if you are a Laurel & Hardy fan then you should go and see it but even if like me you haven't really seen any of their work then it is still worth your time because it's great to see this story told.

Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018)

The sixth Mission: Impossible film sees Ethan and his gang are tasked with locating some plutonium but when the deal goes wrong and places like the Vatican are attacked. The plots of these films are never built around complexity although they try to make them seem complex with people working for other governments or secret organisations. As ever, Hunt has Luther (Ving Rhames) and Benji (Simon Pegg). It’s still weird to me that Shaun from Shaun of the Dead is in a franchise with Tom Cruise.

Henry Cavill appears in this film as Agent Walker who is the minion of Erika Sloane (Angela Bassett) and I do like how there is a sense of distrust between Hunt and Walker. It made the film feel quite big when Ethan Hunt takes on Superman. It was clear that there was something other than lackey to Walker because it's Superman and you don't just give him a straight forward role and it turns out to be but the obvious deception is worth it when we get an epic final battle between the two on the side of a mountain.

The Mission: Impossible films usually have an international and dare I say it, glamorous feel to it. This story takes place largely in Paris and London. I don't know whether the budget was cut because the locations are in countries where tax breaks seem to dictate where they go. This does limit what they can do because it means that all we get are bike/car chases through the streets of Paris and Tom Cruise running around the streets of London including one shot of him breaking his ankle which is kept in the final movie. I suppose if you're going to break something in your body then you want to make it worth it by including it in the movie.

Tom Cruise is very much a part of this franchise. It’s hard to believe that it's been 22 years since the first Mission film and it's a very different franchise compared to what it was perceived to be in 1996. Cruise’s willingness to do insane stunts including flying in a helicopter and running across buildings are the single biggest selling point of these films and long may they continue because I don't think they will ever get boring but I suppose time will tell. Rhames and Pegg are very good as Hunt’s sidekicks and Pegg provides the comic relief when the situation calls for it.

As much as I enjoyed this film, I dont think it's the best in the franchise. Yes there are some enjoyable fight scenes and it feels very much like a Mission: Impossible film but it doesn't seem to have quite the same glamour that Rogue Nation or Ghost Protocol had. Fallout does what it does and does it very well but it's a very minor step down in terms of quality for the franchise.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018)

After the surprise success of Jurassic World (making around $1.6 billion at the box office), it was inevitable that there would be a sequel. Like The Lost World in 1997, this film doesn't quite have the magic of the previous one. The film sees Claire who is now running the Dinosaur Rescue Group and is leading a recovery team to rescue Blue the raptor before a volcano on Isla Nublar. Quite why you would build a tourist park with an active volcano is a mystery. But the film doesn't spend very long on the island which is a shame really but it moves to a giant house. It’s at this point we are introduced to Rafe Spall. Spall is the baddie of the movie and its clear he is the baddie from the very first scene he is in when he is charming towards Claire. It turns out that there is a guy who is even more loathsome and that's some guy played by Toby Jones.

The film attempts to rewrite a bit of the backstory for Jurassic Park with Lockwood being the guy that helped John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) create the dinosaurs. Frankly it's kind of pointless as all it seems to achieve is lead us to the house with the massive underground lab that Lockwood seemingly didn't know anything about. The film has bit plot holes like this which makes it less interesting than the previous film.

To replace the kids from the previous film, Claire and Owen have sidekicks to help them in the film. Franklin is the cowardly lion of the film which gets very tiring very quickly. Zia is the stronger minded of the two and she has a bit more to her character but to be honest neither of them have much more going for them. They do all the techie stuff whilst Claire and Owen are running around doing the action stuff. They disappear for a large portion of the movie and it wasn't till I saw them again that I was reminded they were even a part of the film.

The scene where Owen, Claire and Franklin are running towards the coast with the other dinosaurs trying to outrun the fiery boulders the volcano is throwing up would have looked really good had it not been featured in trailers.

What annoyed people was that all the trailers seemed to suggest that Jeff Goldblum would feature more in the film than he ultimately did. He appears at some senate committee at the beginning and the end but that's about it. He’s probably on screen for 2 minutes in total but that's it. Also a problem is that they use the nostalgia stuff in this film in a less interesting way to the previous one. We have the kid in the small space as a dinosaur approaches them and a few other things that just felt like they were using it this time to distract you.

That's not to say that there aren't good moments. My favourite comes when Maisie is hiding in the bed as the dinosaur is hunting her. It’s got atmosphere and its well done and its one of the few moments that's felt like there was any major thought put into this film. The final 30 minutes of the film feels like it has some energy to it but by this point the film had shown it wasnt going to be as good as the previous JW film.

The ending of this film does feel like someone watched the Matt Reeves Planet of the Apes trilogy as at the end of the film all the dinosaurs are on the mainland and are running free which will be the main plot of the next Jurassic World film. To be fair it was a great way to end the film and acts as a nice teaser for the Dominion. Overall I found this to be a big step down in terms of quality and enjoyment. Things were there that kept my attention but it never had any impact that the previous film had. I think that despite the best efforts of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard, the film feels like a load of different things cobbled together and as a result its disappointing to watch. Not terrible but not great either.

Avengers: Infinity War (2018)

Avengers: Infinity War is the beginning of the end. The first Avengers film was a big success with 2015’s Age of Ultron being a disappointment. It's tricky to make Avengers movies work because there are so many different elements to put together and if the story isn't very good then the whole thing can go wrong. This is the first part of two (the second part coming next year) and comes in at 2 hours and 34 minutes which is the longest of the Avengers movies.

The opening scene might be one of the best opening 10 minutes or so that I have seen in a Marvel film. Thor and Loki versus Thanos which sees Loki killed by Thanos’ bare hand. This is the Russo Brothers way of saying this is what you can expect from these two films.

Thanos is perhaps the best villain that has ever featured in a Marvel film and that's partly because he has been involved one way or another in all the plots of the Marvel films and that alone makes him feel like the epic final boss. There is also the fact that he doesn't want the stones and the gauntlet to be a dictator but because he wants to bring balance to the universe and all he wants to do after that is rest. Literally the last shot of the film is him at peace and that makes it hard to 100% dislike him.

There are a couple of things that I am not so keen on. The Vision/Wanda portion of the film wasn't particularly interesting although it was fun seeing it filmed in Edinburgh. I know a lot of people might like it but the bickering between Tony Stark and Doctor Strange really did annoy me. I couldn't wait for the story to move away from them. Sometimes Robert Downey Jr.’s humour works but it felt like a bit of a misfire in this film.

I did like the relationship between Thanos and Gamora. It’s the thing that I found the most interesting aspect of the film. Yes everyone is going to be excited for all the characters to meet up again and in some cases for the first time but I think that this felt like something important and substantial. That is why when Thanos throws Gamora off the cliff to make the sacrifice it was a shocking moment and felt for the first time like there were some high stakes involved.

The moment when Thanos gets all his stones and clicks his fingers leading to half of humanity being wiped out is a fantastic moment and as it has been something that Marvel have been building up to for a decade, it didn't disappoint. It came after a long and very well set up fight on Wakanda and

Despite being two and a half hours long and part one of two, I felt like it was the perfect running time. Everyone got their time on screen and got something to do. It didn't feel like they were rushing things or struggling for things to do. It’s one of those rare instances where the run time was perfect. The only real downside to the film is that we will have to wait a year to see how this all pans out. The film does what it needs to do and does it very well. Time will tell if it was worth it.