Godzilla Raids Again (1955)

After the success of the first Godzilla film, it was inevitable that there would be another and this one came out twelve months after the first which is a crazy turn around time. This time the humans aren't just battling with Godzilla but a new monster supposedly from his past and called an Anguirus. 

Kobayashi and Tusikoka are the two main characters as pilots that end up trying to kill Godzilla. I think that they work better than Ogata and Serizawa in the last film. They get around the fact that Godzilla was defeated in the last film saying that (for some reason) the information is gone. A lot seems to have happened in the short time since the first film. They seem to be able to monitor his movements a lot better and even have air raid shelters ready for when he does appear.

It might seem strange to bring another monster into things but from an entertainment point of view it makes sense because all the humans can really do is stand there and do narrative commentary of what is happening. There needs to be something for Godzilla to be up against and another monster is just the answer. Now the 'fighting' might not be the best because at times it is comically sped up so some Benny Hill music wouldn't look out of place but at least they would get better.

Anguirus is the first monster that Godzilla fights in these films and it's not the greatest to be honest. Aside from the comedic pace the fights are the best. I suppose it's quite harsh to compare this to today's standards but I just think that it was limited from what we would get in future films. 

The plan is another simple one, this time they are going to bury it under mountain rocks and they end up doing it before the film ends. I would be lying if I said that this was a good Godzilla film. It doesn't quite have the same impact as the first one because the first one is about something. This just felt like a standard monster movie of the period where people spend lots of time talking and then there are a few brief moments of action.

Insidious: Out of the Further (2026)

We have been on a great run of horror films this year with Backrooms, Obsession, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, Evil Dead Burn and Primate and yet we have another Insidious film to remind us how good we have had it. The last Insidious film was one of the most horror films I can remember seeing and yet Blumhouse feel that we need another one of these films. It is a new family with Gemma and Maya. The film starts in the distant past of 1999 where a young Gemma is living with her mom who is being possessed and ends up dying. Fast forward 20 years and we see a grown up Gemma who is weirdly staying in the same house with her daughter Maya and she is a dental hygienist and straight away my fear of dentist put me on edge.

I thought that Amelia Eve was quite good as Gemma. Despite the odd fact that Gemma still lives in the enormous house that her mother died in, she is a likeable person and her relationship with Island Austin (Maya) was quite nice to watch. The supporting characters are all pretty decent with her boyfriend Nick who seems to come on board to the weird situation rather quickly and also Clare who becomes the vessel for Elise to talk to people in this world. 

With this being a Blumhouse film, they don't really have the patience to be clever with their jump scares and things that are supposed to be scary. The house is way too big but that is the M.O of these films. There are periods of quiet darkness and you can set your watch as to when things go bang quite loudly. There are three old people that look odd and that is apparently enough to make them scary. They do have a purpose later on in the film but it's another cliche that Blumhouse films lean on quite a lot. There is also the ridiculous sight of the house having disappeared and no-one seemingly bothered as no one goes out to check so either everyone is in a deep sleep, dead or no one cares.

So yet again they bring the 83 year old Lin Shaye back and she has been the spine of this franchise and they made up for the lack of Elise in the last one. Her first 'appearance' is in the reflection of Gemma's protective glasses doing action moves that would have been laughable. Due to the fact that the character died, they at least keep creditability by only having her in the further. 

There are moments which are quite good. The couch tunnel moment was quite well done and even though it features in the trailer, this is longer version and quite creepy. Also the old couple that live opposite Gemma and Maya have a funny moment when they are both then, the woman points to the sky and her husband just stands there so she nudges him and he then points to the sky and I thought that was quite funny. 

Out of the Further is a huge improvement on the previous film but that was a low bar to clear. I do think that they need to stop doing these films because whilst they may have been popular in 2010 when the first one came out but we are sixteen years and six films on and there is nothing new and the genre has changed where these films are in danger of becoming cliched. If you have seen the other films then you will probably enjoy them but if you appreciate some creativity then I wouldn't have particularly high expectations.

The Dog Stars (2026)

Ridley Scott films are always worth getting excited about. His recent run has been a bit mixed (House of Gucci) but he shows with stuff like Gladiator II that he can still make exciting films and even though his best film recently was All the Money in the World which was nine years ago, there was still a certain amount of hope that this would a good film starring Jacob Elordi and Margaret Qualley. Set in the near future where a virus has wiped out most of humanity, Hig (Elordi) flies a plane with his dog Jasper and returns to Bangley (Josh Brolin). 

I will be honest and admit that I have never understood the appeal of Elordi. He is a good actor and was really good in Frankenstein but he is one of those actors that Hollywood seems to be pushing as the next big movie star. I must admit that I can seen why because he was quite good as Hig. The bond he has with his dog was lovely and it was quite sad when the dog died especially given the connection his previous life. Margaret Qualley gives a nice performance as Cima. She doesn't get off to the best start but as the film progresses she becomes an important part of the story. It's not a performance on the level of The Substance but it's still a good showing for Qualley. Josh Brolin is good (as always) as Bangley who seems to enjoy the new world a bit too much. He is sidelined sadly when Hig goes off and has a brief moment where he fights off people and somehow survives when things start to blow up. 

Guy Pearce is ok as Pops. His moody attitude towards Hig is entertaining and the inevitable cooling means that they get on by the end. Sadly Pops becomes a background character once they return and Bangley is back in the story. He has maybe two brief appearances but that is it.

The group that attacks Bangley are given a brief bit of backstory but nothing more than that and after the battle they don't appear again. There is a mention about Grand Central which takes way too long to get there and once they do then it leads to the most interesting part of the film where Allison Janney's Darlene who is a good villain but is only in the film for about five minutes before Hig, Pops and Cima make their escape. It's a shame because Janney is quite good as Darlene and if this were a TV season then this would be a very good main villain.

The main issue I have with this film is that there are way too many post apocalyptic films and TV shows that do this type of world better. The 28 Years films are better than this and there are seasons of The Walking Dead that are done better. This film has two hours and things feel rushed and there is no time given to get invested in things. If the film had been structured different or been given an extra 20 minutes then I'm sure things would have worked out a bit better. It's not a terrible Ridley Scott film but it is definitely one of his more disappointing offerings. 

Godzilla (1954)

With the latest Godzilla film due to come out in November, I thought I would start watching them all from the very beginning. This original film is probably my favourite (time will tell on the rewatch). The set up of the film is that after a series of ships sinking, an investigation is started. I usually like the first in a series because it isn't weighed down by over complicated plot strands or characters that are over the top.

The first appearance of Godzilla is relatively lowkey by 2026 standards. The effect might look a bit primitive but for 1954 it did what it needed to do. The next appearance is of Godzilla coming out of the sea and with the black and white filming, it looks a lot more effective and would have probably been the better choice for its first appearance. Something that Godzilla does well (and future films utilise this in every other film) is the destruction is brilliant. His first attack on Tokyo is spectacular and its made even more effective with the great shots to the people as they look on helplessly.

It might be unfair but the scene where there is a discussion about what the reporters saw and there are the stuffy scientists and politicians being shouted at by the residents is a little bit funny. I think this sort of scene was commonplace in films of this period but it just made me chuckle. That's the only time the film made me chuckle. I suppose the other issue with Godzilla that doesn't get really addressed until the terrible Roland Emmerich 1998 version is that it does look like a bloke in a costume.

The score is something that I wanted to point out. Normally films from the 1950's are something that stand out to me because of the score yet there is something about Akira Ifukube's score that manages to convey the terror of what Godzilla is doing yet have moments where the music is somewhat comical. That's not an easy thing to pull off and yet Ifukube manages it really well.

I do like the central performances. I thought that the trio of Hideto Ogata (Akira Takarada), Emiko Yamane (Momoko Kochi) and Daisuke Serizawa (Akihiko Hirata)  helped make the human side of the film more interesting instead of reducing it to screaming. Yamane did unfortunately resort to stereotypical 'woman crying/shrieking at what terror she saw' a couple of time but I thought that the role was well performed by Kochi. Takarada as Ogata is a good leading man although if I were judging by 2026 standards I would say he doesn't have the greatest charisma or charm. Hirata is good as Serizawa but it did feel like his character was centered around the eye patch. It was somewhat inevitable that Serizawa would sacrifice himself to kill Godzilla.

The idea that Godzilla wasn't the only one of his species is an interesting idea of having more of these films and getting yourself out of a creative dead end. Even in the 1950’s they were hinting at sequel bait. I still stand that this is one of if not the best Godzilla films. The story is straight forward, the performances were really good and the way that Godzilla was defeated was rather low key but perhaps one of the more inventive ways instead of building mechagodzillas or using every weapon known to man.

Kiki's Delivery Service (1989)

Kiki's Delivery Service is the third Studio Ghibli film I have seen at the cinema after My Neighbour Totoro & Spirited Away. It was nice to see a decent crowd in the screening I was at which was at 7pm on a Friday evening. The story is relatively simple, we meet Kiki who when she turns 13  leaves home to arrives at a town where she starts a delivery service. She doesn't find it easy to make friends and the only young person that seems to show her any interest fancies her and soon invites her to the dance which she doesn't seem to have an interest in attending. It is quite hard to like Kiki for quite a long period in this film. I get that she is trying to find her way in the world but I just found her to be slightly unlikeable but thankfully as the film progresses she warms to her surroundings and is easier to like.

There are a few instances of Kiki's business growing and they are quite interesting. One is where she has to transport a cage with a stuffed cat that looks like Kiki's but due to her inexperience with her broom she crashes into the trees, annoys the crows and the stuffed cat has fallen out so she has to go back and try to find it.  Then she visits an old lady who wants her to deliver a case to her ungrateful granddaughter but due to oven issues it isn't ready so she chooses to help knowing that it might make her late for the party. Then the finale see her trying to save Tombo but she has to make do with a broom but this comes as she is trying to regain her powers but this being a film she manages to get her powers back and this leads to Kiki saving Tombo's life.

The animation, like all Studio Ghibli stuff is beautiful. I like modern animation but there is something about animation from this period that looks like the sort of place you would want to live in. The town that the film is set in looks like a nice mix of old fashioned yet slightly modern and the fact that the people seem to be quite welcoming of a witch is a nice thing to have in the story.

The film does end quite abruptly. I wouldn't have minded if the film spent 10 more minutes with Kiki being accepted by the entire town or a bit more from her parents. They appear at the beginning and then at the end. They felt like an afterthought but it was just the abruptness that stood out to me.

Whilst I really enjoyed Kiki's Delivery Service, I don't think it is as good as Spirited Away or My Neighbour Totoro. I think the lack of fantastic characters or story meant that whilst it was lovely to look at and the score from Joe Hisaishi was lovely to listen to, it doesn't stand up to those other two but its still a highly enjoyable film. I hope there are many more Studio Ghibli films shown at the cinema because seeing them on the big screen is a more rewarding experience than watching them at home.

The Death of Robin Hood (2026)

Normally I would say 'do we need another film about Robin Hood?' But this is a genuinely different take on the mythical character that is perhaps best know for stealing from the rich and giving to the poor. This is very much a different take with Hugh Jackman playing the titular character. This film is directed by Michael Sarnoski who previously did Pig where Nicholas Cage is friends with a Pig and did the Quiet Place prequel which was a lot better than I was expecting but those films are very much character pieces so I sort of knew what to expect but I will be honest that it took a while for me to understand that this isn't your typical Robin Hood film.

Hugh Jackman gives a very good performance but I did feel that it was a bit like a stage performance. The last time I saw Jackman in a movie at the cinema was in The Sheep Detectives and you couldn't get two more different films if you tried and yet Jackman is clearly having fun in both. He gets to do 'proper acting' in this and is the primary reason why the film works as well as it does.

Jodie Comer was also very good as Sister Brigid. It is a fairly ordinary part but Comer does what Comer does and makes it much more interesting than it would have been in the hands of someone else. Brigid's importance in the story comes when it's revealed that Robin Hood killed her family so she is torn with how to feel and what to do. It's a great scene when this revelation happens. Bill Skarsgård also stars in this film as Little John although I honestly didn't know that it was him until I started writing this review. He isn't in it a great deal and it isn't your typical performance from him. 

It is also worth noting that Faith Delaney deserves some praise as she is really quite good as the little girl that Robin Hood becomes attached to and trains her to use a bow and arrow. She is quite good despite not really having much to do but is the emotional weight in that portion of the film.

There are some truly beautiful location shots in this film and that almost becomes a character in itself. I think it has been a good year for films with stunning locations as Glenrothan and 500 Miles have shown some incredible sights and this film probably tops them. Not sure how much was special effects or how much was real but that along with the cinematography helps create a wonderful world.

It is worth pointing out that this was a preview screening and yet I was the only person in the screening. It has been a very long time since I have had a screening all to myself. I think that this is going to be a tough watch for most people. The film is more of a character piece which worked for me but if you are looking for something along the lines of Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves then you are going to be disappointed but if you want something that follows a man trying to come to terms with his life as he is about to reach the end then I think that you will take something from it. 

It's worth watching but I don't think it will watched by many but I hope that I am proved wrong.

Mutiny (2026)

I had the choice to either see the new Insidious movie or the latest Jason Statham hitting and shooting people. I chose the latter cause I knew it would be more fun. You know what you are getting with a Jason Statham film. He usually plays an ex army guy or ex special forces or in this case an ex-police officer that finds himself framed for the murder of the man he is protecting because the company is about to be sold and some criminals want to use the business to transport people in a human trafficking ring and Statham is trying to find out who killed his boss.

Jason Statham is as good as he always is. He isn't the best actor in the world but he gets by on his fight scenes and the fact he understands his audience and doesn't stray too far away from that. There was one moment where he attempts to show he has some range but getting teary eyed over his dead dad who we learn died trying to save his son. He doesn't quite pull it off but it was fun seeing him attempt something some 30 years after first appearing in Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. Annabelle Wallis plays Angie who is summoned to the ship at the last minute and ends up helping Statham’s Cole. I thought that Wallis did a good job with what was a rather limited role. They do have a silly scene where they are in the engine room and are communicating on headsets which made me wonder why they didn't just shoot the scene in another room but both Statham and Wallis do well with it and work well together.

There are the usual issues with a Statham film, the plot is somewhat cliched and generic and I thought having the boat as the singular setting would be a huge advantage because I usually like films with one setting but it felt like it was a disadvantage. Also the fact that whilst the captain (Roland Møller) is a villain the main villain is actually Daniles (Simon Kluth) who is only in the film for about 10 minutes and 2 of those are his death scene. Ok it led to a good one liner from Statham but I think the film would have been better served with just one main villain and that would be the captain cause he was quite good.

At the point where Statham kills the captain with the harpoon gun, the crowd in the screening I was in cheered. Not quietly but quite loud in a way that I hadn't heard for a very long time. It was quite surprising that the screening was as full as it was. I would say that it was about half full and ok the screen was one of the smaller ones but that's still an impressive turnout for a film that will end up on Sky Cinema in a couple of months. I did enjoy this film although I enjoyed Shelter a lot more. I felt that the film did not embrace the absurdity of the situation as much as other Statham films. The fact that everyone is putting in effort helps cover up some of the issues with the film but if you want to spend 90 minutes watching Statham beat people up then this is well worth your time. It’s just that there are better Statham films out there.