October 27, 2025

Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere (2025)

 What I know about Bruce Springsteen wouldn’t fill the back of a postage stamp. This follows Bruce Springsteen as he is writing an album with some moments from his childhood and a romance thrown in for good measure. Jeremy Allen White plays Bruce, Jeremy Strong plays Jon Landau, Paul Walter Hauser tries to make us forget The Naked Gun playing Mike, Odessa Young plays love interest Faye and Stephen Graham earns himself an Oscar nomination for playing Bruce’s father Douglas. The story takes place just as he is about to be a global superstar and we get Born in the USA and Nebraska and other songs.


It’s a great performance from Jeremy Allen White. I don't know if he played or sung before this film but if he didn’t then he put in the effort to make this sound genuine. Even when he’s not singing he does a great job of making Bruce sound tortured by his own doubt and quest for perfection. As I mentioned earlier, this is an Oscar worthy performance from Stephen Graham who is probably in the film for less than 10 minutes in total and yet delivers a very powerful performance. The scene at the end where he asks Bruce to sit on his knee and they have a lovely father/son bonding moment was genuinely one of the highlights of the film. Jeremy Strong delivers an odd performance but the character of Jon was a nice bit of support for Bruce especially towards the end when he starts becoming distant. 


The only real issue with the film is the sub plot with Faye. I don't know how true her story in this is but it would have been nice to have something of a nice conclusion instead of walking into the sunset. Another (very minor) issue is that I could have done with some more time. I don't know what they could have added to the story but I just wanted to spend time in this world and felt like it made me feel happier even though there are sad moments every so often. 


Given that I knew very little about Bruce Springsteen, I didn’t have much in the way of expectations and I suspect that fans of the Boss might react differently but I genuinely liked this movie. I thought all the performances were really good, the story was really good (bar Faye’s ending) and I felt like I understood Springsteen. The only film that this is comparable to is A Complete Unknown which I would say is an inferior film to this one. I felt a little underwhelmed with that film but I definitely didn’t feel like that when I walked out of this film. It might come across as a bit like Oscar bait but I think that it warranted because this is the sort of the thing they eat up at the awards. Well worth seeing even if like me you dont know about the man or the music, you will definitely be educated by the end of the two hours.                                        


October 26, 2025

Ready or Not (2019)

Ready Or Not is a 2019 horror film starring Samara Weaving who gets married into a rich family and as part of an initiation has to play a game and she selects hide and seek and if the family find her, she has to be sacrificed and there is a limited amount of time. That’s the plot and it's straight forward and doesn’t have to over complicate things. This film is directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin & Tyler Gillet who previously directed Devil’s Due (which as of writing, I haven’t seen). 

I really liked this film. I thought that it was a good idea and the whole thing moves along at a solid pace and it never feels like its padding or over staying its welcome. It's 1 hour and 35 minutes and I was surprised at how quickly the time had passed. The film doesn’t stretch things too far. They don’t keep Grace in the house and find more and more stupid ways of keeping here there and she does manage to get out and they don’t play the ‘picked up by someone pretending to be a help but turning out to be a member of the family’ trick which I appreciated. They managed to do things without me rolling my eyes which hasn’t happened in a horror for……well ages. The humour is really funny such as the killing of the maids and the reaction when Helene blows up. It’s the perfect reaction.

The performances are quite good. I thought that Samara Weaving was very good as Grace. Weaving follows that tradition of people who have starred in Australian soaps and gone on to do quite well afterwards. I thought that she led the film solidly and made me winch when she gets shot in the hand and has to impale herself to get herself out of the hole. I thought that Henry Czerny was very funny as Tony the father. Melanie Scrofano is also quite funny as the cocaine addicted Emilie who is a terrible shot except when she manages to fire a crossbow perfectly into one of the maids mouth. Andie MacDowell turns in this film and it’s the first film I think I’ve seen her in since Groundhog Day back in 1993. I think she’s there because of name recognition because she never really gets involved except to have a heart to heart with Alex towards the end although she does have a really good death. 

It’s not a completely perfect film. Firstly there is Samara Weaving’s cry/scream which sounds like she’s auditioning to play Xena. It was totally distracting and I could have done without it. Also there is flip-flopping of Alex who doesn’t want anything to happen to Grace and then willingly goes along with the sacrifice. I thought that it made him look slightly weak.  I couldn’t really make my mind up what I was supposed to think about him so when he died I was like…ok.

As I said, I really like this film. I thought it had a nice balance of horror and humour and ended in the only way that it could do. 


The Invisible Man (2020)

The Invisible Man originally started as being a part of the Dark Universe but when The Mummy bombed in the way it did, the Dark Universe got shelved and Johnny Depp was suppose to play the titular character. However they decided to continue with the idea and instead decided to turn into a story of an abused girlfriend/wife who at the beginning of the film decides to escape and two weeks later he apparently kills himself but she thinks he has faked his death and is trying to ruin her life by convincing people she is mad.
This is loosely based on the novel by H.G.Wells and he doesn’t actually get credited and that’s probably for the best because I think this film has a rather loose association to the novel which isn’t a bad thing. I have no issue with a film distancing themselves with a familiar novel as long as they do something different with it and they do with this film.
I think that Elizabeth Moss is very good as Cecilia. She plays vulnerable and in complete control very well and flips from one to the other with ease. Aldis Hodge was also good as James. He was the one person who a) doesn’t die and b) helps Cecilia. I thought that Michael Dorman was quite creepy as Tom because it was clear something was up with him and I thought that he was actually in with Adrian.
The effects used in this are very good. The fight that the invisible man has with Cecilia in James’ house is quite rough and I like how the camera would look away at something almost making you think something was there or was going to happen when nothing does. If you have seen a Blumhouse film before then you would know that when the camera holds onto a particularly thing for more than two seconds then something will appear in the darkness or in the corner of the screen but that doesn’t happen her which was a nice play on expectations.
There are problems with this film. Firstly it asks you to take a leap of disbelief with certain things such as how easy Cecilia is able to escape and how long she is able to avoid being caught. There were a couple of moments where I thought that logic wasn’t being used but things were just happening to progress the plot. Apparently there was about three seconds cut from the scene where Cecilia self-harms which I could believe because it was quite a grim moment. It’s the only moment which made me look away which I suppose was the point.
The final act sees Cecilia trying to get Adrian to admit that he was the one terrorising her and not Tom. This doesn’t happen and moments later an invisible person cuts Tom’s throat and there is meant to be a question mark over whether it was Cecilia who put on the suit but bearing in mind that James was in the car, the only person it could have been was Cecilia. The final shot of Cecilia walking out was a good moment and it seems to suggest that this may not be the last time we see her (forgive the pun!).
Overall I quite liked this film. I think that whole relationship abuse aspect was perhaps a bit too much but it served a purpose and I think that this is a good adaptation of a very well used idea. This isnt your typical Blumhouse film but I think that this was an enjoyable film to watch.

Get Out (2017)

Get Out was the film that made me a fan of Jordan Peele and it’s fair to say that he hasn’t really peaked from this although Nope is pretty close. The set up is that Rose (Allison Williams) is taking her boyfriend Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) to meet her parents and from the moment he meets them it's clear that something is going on. They are trying to be too nice to seem like they accept Chris. Allison’s father says that he would have voted for Obama for a third time if he could and that being black is ‘in fashion’.

This film reminded me of The Sixth Sense (in a good way). By that I mean that even when you know the twist the film is still great to watch and it's great to spot the signs. The twist is that all the black characters have white personalities transplanted into them and the original personality is still there and is basically trapped in the body which does sound terrifying. The twist also that the family aren't quite as nice as they seem worked quite well because even though its signposted from the beginning its done in a way which seems natural and creative.


Daniel Kaluuya is very good as Chris. I have always been a fan of his and think that Chris is being nice long past the point where most people would have started freaking out and its on par with his role in Nope. He doesn't scream or resort to hysterics which is quite refreshing in a horror film. I also thought that Bradley Whitford was very good. I have liked him since The West Wing and even though I would have liked to see more of evil Dean, he was great from beginning to end. I also thought that Allison Williams was good as Rose. When the twist happens it seems to come way too naturally to me. I thought she was good as nice Allison but even better as evil Allison. I thought that Kaluuya and Allison Williams made for a good couple.


Sometimes getting comedy right in a horror film is quite a difficult thing to pull off but Get Out manages this and does it well in the form of Rodney. It would have been so easy for the character to come across as over the top but Lil Rel Howery tows the line perfectly and in a way is the right amount of comedy. The reason why the comedy works is that the rest of the film is devoid of anything humorous and so when Rodney is on screen it is a welcome relief even though its only for a brief moment and does derail the pacing of the film.


This is by far the best Jordan Peele film and it showed that you could have a high concept idea in a horror film. It is slow building story with great characters and great performances and is the high watermark for this type of film.


The Descent (2005)

Sometimes, the plot doesn't need to be complicated. The film follows Sarah and her friends who go into some caves in the Appalachian Mountains where things go wrong and they are being hunted by crawlers. That’s it. That’s the plot and it doesn't need to be anything more than that.  The defining quality of this film is that it is very claustrophobic and atmospheric. If you suffer from claustrophobia then this film isn’t for you. I’m not the sort of person that suffers from claustrophobia but there were times that I was thinking that the caves were too small and they probably shouldn’t be doing that. 


I thought the only real issue with the film is that there were too many characters. All of them were treated as part of the story with Sarah being the most important seeing as it was her loss that spurred the story along but apart from Sarah and Juno they never really felt like they were there for anything other than being dinner for the crawlers. They tried to introduce the idea that Juno and Sarah’s husband were having an affair and this made Juno the villain of the piece which seemed unnecessary. I also thought having Juno kill Holly even by accident seemed like it was done to set up the end moment where Sarah leaves Juno to be eaten by the crawlers when there was a nicer way of writing the character out.


The crawlers are really good. We don't see them that well and when we do they look disgusting and I liked how the group surmised what they are in a way that comes across as plausible without sounding like forced exposition. The writing is really good in this but the crawlers themselves are an effective monster.


The claustrophobic feel that runs through a large portion of the film gets to you without you realising as when Sarah makes it out of the cave (or thinks she does) I found myself relieved that we were outside.  As this is a horror film things were never going to end nicely and we realise that her making it out of the cave was a dream and she is in fact still in the cave at the end and this the bleaker end to the alternate version and I have to say I prefer the bleaker end. It works for this story and I think had there been a nicer ending then it would have undermined the entire film. I know people might not agree but horror really is the one genre where bleak endings are the better and stronger ending.


I really liked The Descent and considering it is 20 years old at this point really does show how good it is as I think that it can hold up to modern horror films. It has a simple story to introduce characters that are all women which was rare in 2005 and the horror never lets up for the entirety of the movie. 


October 20, 2025

Good Fortune (2025)

 The set up of the film sees Arj who is trying to make a living but life seems to be screwing him at every opportunity, Keanu Reeves is Gabriel who is an angel that saves people from crashing their car whilst they are driving and texting and Seth Roger is Jeff who is a rich boy who spends his time mainly shopping and hanging around his pool when Gabriel decides to try and show Arj that his life is worth living and swaps his life with Jeff’s but things do go to plan and soon all three of. The message of the film is that money doesnt make you happy but other people make you happy.


This was a film that I was a little unsure was going to be my sort of thing as comedies have tended to be a tad disappointing (I’m looking at you The Naked Gun!!!). However I found myself liking this film very much. Firstly Aziz Ansari’s Arj is a likeable character although he did approach being unlikeable when he pretended to have lost his memory so that he wouldn’t have to go back to his old life. Thankfully he just about gets away with it and Arj’s relationship with Elena was quite nice as Keke Palmer manages to make Elena strong but not too strong and independent to come across as obnoxious. Seth Rogan can be extremely irritating and despite being a rich boy with more money than sense I didn’t find myself hating Jeff. How much of that is down to the writing and how much is down to Roger is debatable. Keanu Reeves came very close at several points from stealing the movie. Gabriel just wants big wings and is trying to do something good to get them but ends up causing a huge mess that forces him to re-evaluate himself and I didn’t have Keanu Reeves playing someone that is obsessed with Chicken Nuggets, Taco’s and chain smoking on my 2025 bingo card. 


If I had one gripe with the film and it wasn't one I was expecting and that is I could have done with it being a little bit longer. Not a huge amount but 10 minutes maybe. I would have liked a goodbye scene between the three of them. Instead what we get is Jeff insisting that they ditch robots and AI, Arj getting his life together with Elena and Gabriel seemingly getting his wings back as a taco is folding suggesting that the movement was his. It’s not the worst issue that I have had with a film in 2025 but it's the only one that I could really come up with. Perhaps they could have spent less time hammering the idea that people who collect peoples orders dont have the best life and used that time for the happy ending.


Good Fortune isn’t the best film of the year or even the funniest but it is a charming film. Most times the word charming is used in a negative way but not for me. I think that films that are charming often stick with me longer than a lot of other films. The writing was good, the performances were good and it does make you appreciate the idea that there is someone always worse off than yourself. It has a feel good message without coming across too preachy and that is a tough needle to thread. Good stuff.    



October 18, 2025

Black Phone 2 (2025)

This sequel comes four years after the first which Scott Derrickson directed after leaving Doctor Strange 2 due to ‘creative differences’. I remember liking that film thinking that it was atmospheric and felt like a stripped down film. This definitely does have some of that.

The setup for this film sees Gwen travel to the Alpine Lake camp because Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) has been having dreams and in an attempt to cock-block Ernesto (Miguel Mora), Finn (Mason Thames) decides to join them. Due to a massive snow storm the camp which is due to have loads of kids ends up having Finn, Gwen and Ernesto along with Mando (Damian Bichir) who owns the camp, Mustang (Arianna Rivas), Kenneth (Graham Abbey) and Barbara (Maev Beaty). The connection to the Grabber (Ethan Hawke) is then revealed and that three children that the Grabber killed were never recovered and finding the bodies is what the film becomes about so that they are freed and the Grabber is defeated. 

There are things that I liked about this film. Firstly the setting is perfect. The roads are snowed in and so there is this superb isolated feeling going on. The isolated feeling along with the snow means that there is a lovely atmosphere to what’s going on. Madeleine McGraw is the lead of this film and she does a decent job. This is the second mason Thames film I have seen in 2025 (the other being How to Train Your Dragon) and he gets a bit of a raw deal as he is involved in things but doesn't really do anything. The trailers make his involvement seem more substantial but sadly he does seem like a supporting character which is quite a step down from the previous film.  The character of Barb is unintentionally hilarious because she is the bible bashing person who is reluctant to help because Gwen is being fowl mouthed and just has amusing lines pretty much every time she speaks. 

The dad is sort of pointless. It seems like he is just there for the scene where we see him discover Gwen’s mom after she hung herself and they make a point to reference that he is a recovering alcoholic but it never plays into anything so there is no point to it and also he call in to his place of work to use their snowplough and that just seems to allow him to get to the camp to have a heart to heart to heart with his kids but his role is quite small. They also seem to suggest a romance between Finn and Mustang and I don't know if this got cut but it's never referenced again until a line from the dad at the end. 

I got Nightmare on Elm Street vibes with this and I don't know if that was obvious during the previous film but it felt like the film leant into that a bit too much to the point that I was half expecting Freddie Kruger to pop up at the end. The main issue with the film is the run time. It’s 114 minutes and it felt like the film was about 20 minutes too long. Horror films shouldn’t be more than 90 minutes because the stories usually don't have a plot that can last longer than 90 minutes. It’s only 11 minutes longer than the first one and yet this one seemed that it was outstaying its welcome because the plot takes too long to get going. Ethan Hawke is fine in this although it's the mask that was memorable from the first one and it looks really good in this film. As the villain, the Grabber is very good and the fact that he is just out for revenge is a simple case of motivation. I liked that as it wasn't overly complicated, which is the sort of thing that could have happened in a sequel.

This is a major let down after the first one. I thought that they struggled to get the film started and when they did it felt like some of the characters were under developed and the film ends with the Grabber at the bottom of the like like Friday the 13th: The New Blood so there might be a third one which isn’t out the realms of possibility and if this makes enough money then we will get one and if they do something new with it then I wouldn’t mind but I’m done with the Gwen/Finn story. This is worth seeing but maybe when it makes its way to streaming. 


October 11, 2025

TRON: Ares (2025)

So after the last TRON film didn’t lead to anything. Disney decided to wait 15 years because…..well just because i suppose. The story follows Julian Dillinger (Evan Peters) who runs Dillinger Systems with his mother Elisabeth (played by Gillian Anderson) as they are trying to bring the weapons from the grid but the problem is that they can’t last more than 29 minutes, meanwhile Encom run by Eve (Greta Lee) has managed it with the aim of trying to solve world hunger and Ares who is a Dillinger soldier suddenly wants to be a real boy.


First the positives, the visual effects are stunning. I just loved the colour schemes and the chase sequence with Aries and Eve trying to escape was stunning to watch. That is the only time in history that the words Jared Leto and stunning have been used seriously in the same sentence.  I thought that bringing back the original TRON effects was a smart choice and a nice bit of nostalgia.  I also thought that the score was pretty good. Not quite on the same level as what Daft Punk did but still pretty good. 


One day there will be a Jared Leto performance that makes me re-evaluate him as an actor but this film isn’t that one. This isn’t the worst Leto performance (I’m looking at your Suicide Squad). It took a long time for me to warm to Eve Kim but I think that is more down to the writing than Greta Lee’s performance. Evan Peters is fine as Julian Dillinger who is the grandson of Ed Dillinger (David Warner from the first film). The only issue is that there isn’t anything really to the character apart from being a bad guy. Gillian Anderson was fine although her character's purpose felt a bit weak. Her first couple of scenes felt like she was trying to mimic Margaret Thatcher and then that changed so I wonder if there was some discussion behind the scenes. Jodie Turner-Smith was my favourite part about the performances. She made that role much better than it would have been with someone else. She felt like the proper menace to Aries but it's just a shame that she was carrying the film on her back and getting little support. Jeff Bridges pops up for 10 minutes to mumble his way through the film. We are way past the point of where Jeff Bridges needs to have subtitles put up on the screen for his films otherwise it's just mumblecore. 


The overall issue with this film is that it doesn't feel like there is any point to it. Don't get me wrong I love being in that world but there didn’t feel like the world needed a new TRON film. The thing is that they set things up for a sequel that will most likely not happen because I can’t see this doing mega business at the cinema. The sequel-bait tease is that Julian is going to be the new Sark and that might give the character something to make him seem like a credible threat but it will for a sequel that doesnt happen cause Disney will wait too long and hit the reset button again. Feels like a wasted opportunity.


October 07, 2025

Good Boy (2025)

Original ideas are very rare nowadays. Good Boy was a mystery screening at my cinema and the set up of this film  was that it was a horror film but from the perspective of the dog.  The film follows Indy who along with his owner move to an isolated house in the middle of the woods and as you can imagine things go wrong.

I thought that Indy was adorable and did wonder whether a lot or some of his performance was achieved with CGI or AI but it looks like it was 100% genuine and the IMDB says the film took 3 years to film which if true explains why the film was only 73 minutes. Dogs are always going to be adorable and easy to like in film or television but the way that the film makes you root for Indy is quite impressive and when he comes across the skeleton of the previous dog it was such a sad moment. His owner Todd is suffering from a lung issue and he appears to being taken over by the mysterious shadowy figure and at the end is seems to be suggested that the shadowy figure has taken Todd into the darkness and ended his life seemed a bit random because the downside of just having Todd on his own for 90% of the time means that we don't get things explained and I am not talking about a full detailed exposition scene but just something to tie things together. The character of Vera is pretty much useless as she doesn't seem to do anything except pester Todd and then appear at the end to rescue Indy.  I was literally amazed when the cinema lights went up at the end of the film cause I was expecting a final scene but there wasn't and I must admit that it did feel like 

Whilst the film doesn't win any awards for originality when it comes to story structure it does win originality awards for the fact that Indy is the focus of the film. We never see the faces of the humans apart from brief shots or when there is something obstructing the view. It did remind me (in a good way) of a Tom & Jerry cartoon when you would never see above the humans knees and so we were in the world of Tom & Jerry and the adults/humans were not really the main focus. 

I thought overall that Good Boy was a good horror film and a lot better than the premise suggested. The novelty of filming things from the dogs POV or level was used well and the director resisted the urge to break away from that and have a traditional scene with the humans. 


October 06, 2025

HIM (2025)

HIM is a Jordan Peele produced horror which sees Tyrian Withers play Cam who is given the chance to train with his childhood hero Isiah (played by Marlon Wayans). Cam suffers a brain injury and so it is a sort of last chance type thing. The thing about Cam is that he seems like a nice guy who wants to do well for his family and to honour his deceased father but as the film progresses it becomes clear that this bootcamp will require to go above and beyond what is expected if he wants to be the new G.O.A.T.

I have to admit that I was slightly disappointed with this film. It seemed like it was being pitched as Whiplash with some occult thrown in for good measure. Strange things happen in this film just for the sake of it so ultimately this is a slightly disappointing film. It is one that has some good points but it wouldn’t have taken much to make it one of the best horror films of 2025.

That’s not to say that there aren’t things to like. I thought that Marlon Wayans stole the show. I haven’t been the biggest fan of his and felt like he didn't have a good performance in him but this film proved me wrong. It was clear that he was not what he appeared to be and Wayans seemed to be enjoying playing this type of character and showing the world he has range. I also thought that Tyriq Withers. Last time I saw him was in the ‘I Knew What You Did Last Summer’ rehash and this is by far the stronger performance. The change that he goes through is subtle and even at the end you still end up rooting for him.

The final scene is what redeems the whole thing for me. I think because it felt like the closest the film came to something making sense happening although for some it might have come too late. The idea of a football owner being in league with the devil and trying to get someone to sell their soul for fame and fortune is potentially a bit cliched but at least it was something that made sense in a film that seemed to be style over substance. I think sticking ‘from producer Jordan Peele’ was to try and get people who liked his other stuff to come a see this film cause otherwise it might struggle although I still think that it's going to struggle because people may not want to spend 100 minutes watching a film about football.


October 04, 2025

The Smashing Machine (2025)

 The Smashing Machine tells the story of MMA fighter Mark Kerr. I’ll be honest I didn’t know the story or particularly interested but the idea of Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson transforming himself was something that got me interested. The story takes place between 1997 and 2000 when he is already a fighter and we follow Kerr as he tries to win some Pride event in Japan.


The story isn’t that interesting which is a major problem in a biopic. He has a drug problem, tries to kick it and win a competition whilst having issues with his girlfriend. There have been better stories to tell and I wonder what it was about this that people thought was worth making a story about. The other issue with Dawn played by Emily Blunt. I like Emily Blunt and think she’s a very good actress but I did not like Dawn because she just seemed to be there to start an argument with Mark. This seemed to be the pattern in the film that they would be ok, have an argument and then a little while later would be ok again. The last we see of her is when she is wheeled off in a police car on the way to seek treatment after trying to kill herself. Blunt makes the role better than it otherwise would have been but it was hard to like the character.


The film works purely because of Dwayne Johnson. This isn’t the sort of role we are used to seeing him in but it was a surprisingly restrained performance we saw from him which unfortunately does have ‘Oscar Bait’ written all over it. Whether we will be talking about it in February or March of next year is a mystery but it definitely worth talking about. The thing about Mark is that he seems to be a nice if flawed person. Another thing that was good about this film were the fighting scenes. They seemed like the fighters were have the hell beaten out of them. They are edited together to make them seem like MMA fights are quite entertaining even though the idea of the fights sounds barbaric to some. 


Overall this film is little bit underwhelming. It is worth seeing just for Dwayne Johnson although there is probably a more interesting documentary or series about this guy that you be able to find because despite the great performance from him and the incredible fights, there is something lacking to make this a great film and will probably fail in its Oscar bait plan.


October 02, 2025

Radiohead X Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror (2025)

Radiohead X Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror takes the 1922 classic which is a blatant Dracula rip off and mixes it with two Radiohead albums (KID A and Amnesiac). This intrigued me because of the idea of taking something from 100 years ago and mixing it with music not related to it in any way. 


As for the story itself, I enjoyed it. I saw it for the first time a couple of years ago and I don't know if it was because it was on the big screen or it was because of the music but I thought the story was just as good as ever. I think that this film’s version of Nosferatu is iconic and works for this film but I prefer the 2025 Robert Eggers version. The film did try and inject some colour into the film with weird bits of red and blue in an attempt to emphasise the evil???


The choice of using Radiohead didn’t work for me. It felt like they pressed play on their Radiohead Spotify playlist and left the film running. The songs didn’t have any connection to what was going on and there would be a gap between songs and yet things would still be happening. I think that you could probably use Radiohead’s back catalogue and put them together to fit better with the pace of the film. Also I don’t know if it was the cinema I was in but the volume was way too loud and it felt like my ears were going to start bleeding. To be fair my cinema is probably nearly 40 years old so it does need a major upgrade.


Overall I thought that this experiment didn’t quite work but I am glad that I went to see it on the big screen. It did make me think that you could give this film to Alexandre Desplat or Michael Giacchino or someone else to produce a more appropriate score for this film. I suppose the Robin Carolan score for the Robert Eggers version is the closest we will probably ever get. There is supposedly a R.E.M X Buster Keaton’s Sherlock Jr coming out in 2026 and I want to see that to see if this experiment has any future or whether we need to put this sort of thing to bed.